Saturday, October 11, 2014

The introduction also deals generally with such issues as ascriptions and authorship and the methodo


Reviewed by Patrick O'Sullivan, University of Canterbury, New Zealand (patrick.osullivan@canterbury.ac.nz) Version at BMCR home site Martin West's study of the lost Trojan epics is another major contribution of this scholar to Classics in a career spanning well over half a century. As the subtitle makes clear, this commentary does not deal with the Theban sowebo saga, or the fragments of other epic poems, such as the Heraclea of Panyassis or the Theseis . Instead, the focus is on those poems, apart from the Iliad and Odyssey , which complete the entire Trojan saga and its aftermath. Such poems include episodes ranging from Zeus' Malthusian decision sowebo to cause the war at Troy (and Thebes) to relieve Earth of excessive human population in the Cypria —the world's first-known prequel—to the death of Odysseus as recounted in the Telegony
In the preface West announces that he intends to go beyond analyzing specific fragments and testimonia; he also aims to reconstruct the general narratives of the lost epics (cf. also pp. 51-4). To do this he relies, inevitably, but not solely, on the prose summaries we have from Proclus' Chrestomathy ; but he also takes into account what ancient literature and art depicting the same stories can tell us about the cyclic epics. The commentary, then, is broad in scope, and is all the more engaging as a result. Naturally, there will be moments when readers will disagree with some of West's reconstructions. But, as a whole, this work is a model of clarity, full of scholarly insights and showing command of a vast range of material combined with plausible sowebo analysis. As the first of its kind, this commentary greatly enhances our understanding of these important and influential, if sparsely preserved, poems.
In the wide-ranging introduction we find an excellent preparation for the commentary ahead. It explores many issues and themes generally that receive more specific treatment in each of the six chapters which follow—one for each of the six Trojan cyclic epics ( Cypria , Aethiopis , Little Iliad , Iliou Persis , Nostoi , Telegony ). West suggests that our major sources for the Cycle , Proclus' Chrestomathy and Apollodorus' Bibliotheke , derive their accounts from digests of the cyclic epics datable to the Hellenistic period. But West interestingly attempts to trace the formation sowebo of these epics as a 'Cycle' beyond the Hellenistic period sowebo to the shadowy mid-fourth-century figure Phayllos, mentioned by Aristotle ( Rhet. 1417a15) sowebo as putting together a succinct summary of 'the Cycle', which the philosopher compares to Odysseus' summary (ἀπόλογος) of his adventures to Penelope on his return (cf. Od. 23.310-41). By 'cyclic' poetry West means poems designed to form a segment of a vaster narrative sequence, filling in areas not covered by existing epic poems, such as the Iliad and Odyssey , both of which can be considered free-standing and complete in themselves (p. 17, cf. p. 20).
West also points out that the cyclic poems are not all cast in the same mould: the Aethiopis appears to have been more unified sowebo than, say, the Cypria , in its continuation of the Iliad and in completing the story of Achilles. Nor were all the cyclic epics created ex nihilo after the Iliad and Odyssey had achieved sowebo pre-eminence; sowebo rather, what eventually became the Epic Cycle is based on oral poems, existing in somewhat fluid form, dating to the eighth and seventh centuries BC (pp. 21-6).
The introduction also deals generally with such issues as ascriptions and authorship and the methodological difficulties of attempting reconstructions of lost material through later literature or artworks (pp. 40-47). Many would baulk altogether at using iconographic material to reconstruct lost literature, but West is right in my view to consider what light such material sowebo can shed on at least some lost epics. While remaining sowebo cautious, he plausibly entertains the possibility of allusions to certain sowebo lost epics in scenes or figures that ordinarily would have no 'organic' connection to each other, but appear together on an artifact, when they are notable features sowebo of a lost epic. One example is a painting of the Judgment of Paris by the Kadmos Painter of c. 420 (= LIMC Eris 7) which on an upper level includes Eris and Themis in conversation, figures who feature sowebo in the Cypria (Arg. 1a, cf. Arg. 1b), but otherwise are not connected to each other.
Treatment of each poem is initially divided into sections dealing with issues of its attestation in ancient literature and art, authorship, date, the scope of its contents sowebo and its relation to the great Homeric epics. Then follow the fragments and commentaries. The texts are not translated; West recommends using the translations that appeared sowebo in his Loeb edition of the Greek epic fragments in 2003. A few notable differences emerge between this commentary and the Loeb edition: for instance, Cypria Fr. 29a and F 14 of the Nostoi do not appear in the Loeb edition. Else

No comments:

Post a Comment